karen_w_newton (karen_w_newton) wrote,

  • Mood:

Turning up the heat on pros at cons

Having had a few days to mull over my recent time at Balticon, I have to say that there are some writers who really shouldn't go to conventions. While pros go to conventions to promote their works, most of the other people fall into different groups--the book lovers, the gamers, the costumers, the media fans, and those convivial souls who just like to schmooze with like-minded folk. The dealers' room is always full of all of the above. A lot of these people go to conventions for the programming. Basically, a group of "pros" (i.e., published authors) sit behind a table and expound on a topic, which can be advice to writers (e.g., how to get an agent, how to write action scenes), what are the best/worst/most underappreciated works of a given set (e.g., fantasy books of the 20th century, the works of Robert Heinlein, etc.), some scientific conundrum (e.g., can humans ever live in space), or almost anything else you can think of (e.g., why we still need librarians).

The audience listens, presumably learns, and eventually gets to ask questions. Sometimes panels are more spirited than others. Some moderators are better than others at giving all the panelists a chance to talk. But no moderator can stop someone who is bound and determined to be a jerk from getting his way. Some panelists have gotten bitter at only publishing in small presses or in small magazines and want to rail against the state of publishing; some have gotten so successful, they now think they're God's gift to the genre; some have no real knowledge of the topic, but don't let that stop them from laying down the law to the rest of the panel; some are just plain hung over. At bigger conventions like Worldcons, I have been sadly disappointed in learning the ugly truth about writers I had admired for years. I have walked out of panels saying to myself, "Well, that's one writer whose books I'll never buy again."

I can only conclude these folks either never had the ability to look at themselves from other people's perspectives, or if they did, they've lost it. We all have egos, but most of us have some perspective, too.

Sometimes a little distance is a good thing.
Tags: conventions, writers

  • The curse of YA, or Why is Harry Potter an orphan?

    I saw a link on Neil Gaiman's Facebook page to this NYT Books section essay about how prevalent bad or missing parents are in YA fiction. It's a…

  • More on "sticky books"

    Since my post of the other day, I have decided that either kids' books are more likely to be inherently sticky or that things we read when young are…

  • And a little child shall lead them

    The subject line refers not to religion, but to publishing. The Washington Post did away with their print Book World standalone section, which used…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic