karen_w_newton (karen_w_newton) wrote,

  • Mood:

Audio vs. visual?

The New York Times recently ran an article on book club members who look down on audio books—or rather, people who listen to audio books rather than reading print versions. Apparently listening to someone read is not equal to reading in their eyes. They actually called it "cheating."

This struck me as out-and-out snobbery. So long as the audio book sticks with the author's words, what does it matter what format the book is published in? In a previous life I was a teacher, and one thing I learned is that not everyone learns and retains knowledge in the same way. Some people learn better from listening, some from seeing. Why judge one as better than the other? One size does not fit all. It's not like they're reading the Reader's Digest Compressed version for crying out loud. One reason people don't read as much any more is they don't have time. If they make time by listening to books in the car on their way to work, isn't that better than not reading?

Tags: reading

  • As seen on Twitter

    The quality of one's Twitter experience will depend mostly on whom one follows. My list is an eclectic mix of writers, editors, agents, booksellers,…

  • Getting wise about Fictionwise

    Not all ebooks are books! Before last week's Apple " iPod event" in which they so famously did not announce a new "iPad" or tablet PC that could…

  • Why I like Twitter

    In the history of things I never understood until I tried them, Twitter ranks very high. How can something that limits every communication to 140…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic