karen_w_newton (karen_w_newton) wrote,
karen_w_newton
karen_w_newton

  • Mood:

Who gets to say what's the best?

The Guardian Book blog has been interesting lately. Blogger Sam Jordison has posted some entries on the Hugos, reviewing some past winners and also commenting on the field in general. One of his posts on voting for literary prizes specifically posed the question that if democracy is good, can voting to determine a literary prize be bad? A commenter pointed out that the Hugos can't be said to be democratic as you have pay to attend or at least to support the Worldcon to vote, and that the number of people voting is very tiny.

The post also referenced a mention last year of a British trend I have not observed in the States—nonliterary celebrity judges for literary prizes. Being an American, I'm not always familiar with the celebrities in the article or the comments, but I believe some of them are singers while others are sports stars. One of last year's commenter has an argument that summed up the entire debate, asking whether or not these celebrities were ". . . as well qualified as anyone to have a valid opinion on the merits of a book."

Well, I guess the Hugos have a leg up on mainstream awards in that they at least sift out those unfamiliar with the genre. And unlike other awards, you know what you're getting. I doubt most readers know how the Man Booker prize is awarded.
Tags: awards, hugos
Subscribe

  • The curse of YA, or Why is Harry Potter an orphan?

    I saw a link on Neil Gaiman's Facebook page to this NYT Books section essay about how prevalent bad or missing parents are in YA fiction. It's a…

  • More on "sticky books"

    Since my post of the other day, I have decided that either kids' books are more likely to be inherently sticky or that things we read when young are…

  • And a little child shall lead them

    The subject line refers not to religion, but to publishing. The Washington Post did away with their print Book World standalone section, which used…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 2 comments