karen_w_newton (karen_w_newton) wrote,
karen_w_newton
karen_w_newton

The good, the bad, and the useful?

A friend sent me a link to a post on the Guardian Book Blog that took an interesting perspective. Blogger Stuart Evers celebrated the value of bad books in illustrating "what fiction looks like when it's malfunctioning, when all its wiring is hanging out." He's careful to state that he's not talking about genre books that might be merely formulaic in order to meet reader expectations. His definition of a bad book includes a requirement that it must "aspire to be literature, rather than simply product." If you substitute "a good story" for "product," I can agree with him.

He lists some specifics if you want to know of whom he speaks. My favorite quote from the article: ". . .novels that are so self-absorbed probably don't care about their readers." Now that is a sentiment I can endorse.







freehit counter


Tags: writing
Subscribe

  • Balticon 50!

    So, it's been a while. But Balticon celebrated it's 50th anniversary, so I wanted to post some photos. First, here's grandmaster Larry…

  • Balticon 2013

    With my husband still recovering from surgery, we did a very abbreviated Balticon this year, only one day. In fact, I went to exactly one panel,…

  • Con weekend redux

    This year the Nebulas were a local event (see last week's post) and so I ended up with "cons" on back-to-back weekends. I went to…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 1 comment